1

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
                   PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
                              EXCHANGE ACT OFProxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                              [Amendment(Amendment No.    ___________])

Filed by the Registrant  /X/[ X ]
Filed by a partyParty other than the Registrant / /[  ]
Check the appropriate box:
/ /[X ]   Preliminary proxy statement
     / /Proxy Statement
[  ]   Confidential, for useUse of the Commission onlyOnly (as permitted by Rule
       14a-6(e)(2))
/X/[  ]   Definitive proxy statement
     / /Proxy Statement 
[  ]   Definitive additional materials
     / /Additional Materials  
[  ]   Soliciting material pursuantMaterial Pursuant to Sec. 240.14a-11(c)Section 240.14a-11 (c) or
       Sec.Section 240.14a-12

                   CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY,  INC.
       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrantregistrant as Specifiedspecified in Itsits Charter)


    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)

Payment of filing feeFiling Fee (Check the appropriate box):
/X/ $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), 14a-6(i)(2)
          or Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.

     / / $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
         14a-6(i)(3).

     / /[X ]   No fee required.
[  ]   Fee computed on the table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4)(1) and
       0-11.

       (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

           - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transactionstransaction applies:

           - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed 
           pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which 
           the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

           - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

           - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       (5) Total fee paid:

           - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     / /------------------------------------------------------------------
       

[  ]       Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
/ /[  ]       Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange 
           Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting
           fee was paid previously.  Identify the previous filing by 
           registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date 
           of its filing.

        (1)1) Amount previously paid:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (2)Previously Paid:

           ------------------------------------------------------------------
        2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

           - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     (3)------------------------------------------------------------------
        3) Filing party:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     (4)Party:

           ------------------------------------------------------------------
        4) Date filed:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Filed:

           ------------------------------------------------------------------






   2
 
                [CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. LOGO]
 
                            NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
                                OF SHAREHOLDERS
                              AND PROXY STATEMENT
 
                                 MARCH 8, 199511, 1998
   3
 
[CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. LOGO]
 
March 8, 199511, 1998
 
To the Shareholders of
  Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc.:
 
     The annual meeting of shareholders for 19951998 will be held at the Pineville
High School Auditorium at 1511 Line Street, Pineville, Louisiana, on Friday,
April 21,
1995,24, 1998, at 9 a.m., PinevilleCentral time. A notice of annual meeting of
shareholders and proxy statement is enclosed herewith, together with a proxy
that may be used by shareholders who are unable to attend the meeting in person.
 
     The principal items of business to be transacted at the annual meeting are:
(1) the election of directors anddirectors; (2) the appointment of independent auditors of
the Company for the year ending December 31, 1995.1998; (3) the approval of an
amendment to the Company's 1990 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for the
benefit of the outside directors of the Company and a related amendment to the
Company's Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors; (4) the approval of an
amendment to the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation to delete section
3 of article 7 thereof; and (5) the approval of an amendment to the Company's
Restated Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from
Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. to Cleco Corporation.
 
     The board of directors of the Company recommends election of the nominees
for directors anddirector, appointment of the independent auditors, approval of the
amendments to the benefit plans mentioned above, approval of the proposal to
amend the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation to delete section 3 of
article 7 thereof and approval of a proposal to amend the Company's Restated
Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company to Cleco
Corporation, in each case as named or described in the accompanying proxy
statement.
 
     You are cordially invited to attend the meeting. Even if you now expect to
attend the meeting, you are requested to sign, date and return the accompanying
proxy in the enclosed addressed envelope that requires no postage if mailed in
the United States. If you attend the meeting, you may vote in person even though
you have mailed in your proxy. Your continued interest and cooperation are
greatly appreciated.
 
Sincerely,
 
/s/ GREGORY L. NESBITT
Gregory L. Nesbitt
President and Chief Executive Officer
   4
 
                    CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
 
                    NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
                           TO BE HELD APRIL 21, 199524, 1998
 
To the Shareholders of
  Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc.:
 
     Notice is hereby given that the annual meeting of shareholders of Central
Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. (the("Cleco" or the "Company") will be held at the
Pineville High School Auditorium at 1511 Line Street, Pineville, Louisiana, on
Friday, April 21, 1995,24, 1998, at 9 a.m., PinevilleCentral time, for the following purposes:
 
     (1) To elect directors,directors;
 
     (2) To consider and act upon a proposal to appoint the firm of Coopers &
         Lybrand L.L.P., independent certified public accountants, as auditors
         of the Company for the year ending December 31, 1995,1998;
 
     (3) To consider and (3)act upon a proposal to amend the Company's 1990
         Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for the benefit of the outside
         directors of the Company and to make a related amendment to the
         Company's Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors;
 
     (4) To consider and act upon a proposal to amend the Company's Restated
         Articles of Incorporation to delete section 3 of article 7 thereof,
         which section states that no director shall be required to own any
         stock in the Company;
 
     (5) To consider and act upon a proposal to amend the Company's Restated
         Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from
         Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. to Cleco Corporation; and
 
     (6) To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting
         or any adjournments thereof.
 
     Holders of record of common stock and preferred stock of the Company at the
close of business on February 21, 199524, 1998 are entitled to notice of and to vote at
the annual meeting.
 
     The bylaws of the Company require that the holders of shares of capital
stock representing a majority of the votes entitled to be cast be represented in
person or by proxy at the meeting in order to constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business. Therefore, it is important that your stock be
represented at the meeting.
 
     Please date, sign and return the enclosed proxy in the accompanying
envelope.
 
     By order of the board of directors.
 
                                        /s/ MICHAEL P. PRUDHOMME
                                        Michael P. Prudhomme
                                        Secretary/Treasurer
 
March 8, 199511, 1998
   5
 
                    CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
 
                                 P. O. BOXBox 5000
                        PINEVILLE, LOUISIANAPineville, Louisiana 71361-5000
 
                                PROXY STATEMENT
 
                       ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
                    CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
 
     The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the board of directors of
Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. (the("Cleco" or the "Company"), to be voted
at the annual meeting of shareholders of the Company to be held at the time and
place and for the purposes set forth in the foregoing notice. In addition to the
original solicitation by mail, certain regular employees of the Company may
solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile or in person, and Morrow & Company, Inc.
("Morrow") has been retained on customary terms to assist in the solicitation of
proxies. The Company estimates thathas engaged Morrow to assist in the fees and expenses to be incurred in
connection with Morrow's services will besolicitation of proxies
at a fee of approximately $9,000.$11,500, plus expenses. Other than Morrow, no
specially engaged employees or solicitors will be retained to solicit proxies.
All expenses of such solicitation, including the cost of preparing and mailing
this proxy statement and the reimbursement of brokerage firms and other nominees
for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy material to beneficial owners
of the Company's capital stock, will be borne by the Company. This proxy
statement and the accompanying proxy are being mailed to shareholders beginning
on or about March 8, 1995.11, 1998.
 
     All duly executed proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions
thereon. If no instructions have been given in a proxy, the shares represented
thereby will be voted at the annual meeting of shareholders or any adjournments
thereof FOR Item 1 (election of the nominees for director), FOR Item 2
(appointment of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. as independent auditors of the Company
for 1998), FOR Item 3 (approval of a proposal to amend the Company's 1990
Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for the benefit of the outside directors
of the Company and to make a related amendment to the Company's Deferred
Compensation Plan for Directors), FOR Item 4 (approval of a proposal to amend
the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation to delete section 3 of article
7 thereof), FOR Item 5 (approval of a proposal to amend the Company's Restated
Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from Central
Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. to Cleco Corporation) and, in the discretion of
the persons named in the proxy, on any other business that may properly come
before the meeting.
 
     Shareholders who execute proxies however, retain the right to revoke them at any
time before they are voted. A shareholder who attends the meeting may vote in
person even though such shareholder has mailed in a proxy. A proxy may be
revoked by a proxy bearing a later date. The revocation of a proxy will not be
effective until written notice thereof has been given to the secretary of the
Company, unless the person granting such proxy votes in person.
 
                              VOTING OF SECURITIES
 
     As of February 21, 1995,24, 1998, the record date for the determination of
shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting, the Company had        outstanding
22,416,708 shares of common stock, par value $2.00 per share ("Common Stock"), and 374,387
shares of preferred stock, par value $100 per share ("$100 Preferred Stock"),
which are the only classes of stock of the Company outstanding and entitled to
vote at the meeting. Each holder of shares of Common Stock or $100 Preferred
Stock is entitled to one vote for each share held, except that at an election of
directors, each holder of shares of Common Stock is entitled to cast as many
votes as equal the number of such holder's shares multiplied by the number of
directors to be elected, and may cumulate all or any part of such votes for one
or more of the nominees.
 
     Under Louisiana law and the Company's articlesRestated Articles of incorporationIncorporation
and bylaws,Bylaws, an abstention from voting on a matter by a shareholder present in
person or represented by proxy at the
 
                                        1
   6
 
meeting is not a vote "cast" and is counted neither "for" nor "against" the
matter subject to the abstention. Broker non-votes on matters are treated as
shares as to which voting power has been 1
withheld by the beneficial holders of
those shares and, therefore, as shares not entitled to vote. Under Louisiana law
and the Company's articlesRestated Articles of incorporationIncorporation and bylaws,Bylaws, a quorum is
determined based upon the number of outstanding shares of capital stock of the
Company entitled to vote on a matter, including shares relating to abstentions.
 
                             ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
 
     The Company's bylawsBylaws provide for the division of the board of directors
into three classes, Class I, Class II and Class III, with each class consisting,
as nearly as possible, of one-third of the number of directors constituting the
whole board. The term of each directorship is three years, and the terms of the
three classes are staggered in a manner so that only one class is elected by the
shareholders annually. Those persons who served as directors of the Company
during the past year are named in the Company's 1994 annual report1997 Annual Report to
shareholders. ThreeShareholders. Four Class I directors are to be electedproposed for election this year to
serve as members of the board of directors until the annual meeting of
shareholders in 1998,2001, or until their successors are elected and qualified. The
persons named in the accompanying proxy may act with discretionary authority (i)
with respect to cumulative voting of shares of Common Stock and (ii) upon the
unavailability of a nominee for election, although management is unaware of any
circumstances likely to render any of the nominees unavailable for election.
Unless a shareholder specifies otherwise, the persons named in the accompanying
proxy intend to vote in favor of the nominees listed below. The affirmative vote
of a plurality of the total votes cast is required for the election of
directors. All of the nominees, except Mr. David M. Eppler, currently serve as
directors of the Company. Directors who are members of Classes II and III, who
are continuing as directors at this time and whose terms of office expire in
19961999 and 1997,2000, respectively, are named on pages
3 and 4 below.

    The proxies solicited hereby cannot be votedpage 3.
 
     Mr. Hugh J. Kelly, who has served as a director since 1992, will retire
from the board of directors effective at the annual meeting of shareholders
since he has reached the retirement age for a number of persons greater
thanoutside directors specified in the
number of nominees named below.Company's Bylaws.
 
DIRECTORS
 
     The following sets forth information concerning the threefour nominees for
election as directors at the annual meeting of shareholders and the continuing
directors, including the business experience of each during the past five years.
 
                NOMINEES FOR ELECTION UNTIL 19982001 ANNUAL MEETING
 
                               CLASS I DIRECTORS
 
     SHERIAN G. CADORIA has served as president of Cadoria Speaker and
Consultancy Service since January 1992. She retired in 1990 as Brigadier General
of the United States Army after a 29-year military career. Ms. Cadoria (age 55)58)
has been a director of the Company since 1993 and is a member of the
compensation committee of the board of directors.
 
     HUGH J. KELLY isRICHARD B. CROWELL has been engaged in the practice of law for more than
five years as a retired president and chief executive officermember of Ocean
Drillingthe law firm of Crowell & Exploration Company, a company which has offshore drilling operations
and explores for and produces oil and gas. Before he retired from Ocean Drilling
& Exploration Company in 1989, he had served as chief executive officer since
1977 and as president and director since 1974. He is now an oil and gas
consultant.Owens.(1) Mr. KellyCrowell (age
69)59) has been a director of the Company since 1992

                                       2

and is a member of the audit committee of the board of directors.April 1997. He is also a director
of Tidewater, Inc., HiberniaWhitney Holding Corporation and Whitney National BankBank.
 
     DAVID M. EPPLER has served as executive vice president and Chieftain International,
Inc.chief operating
officer of the Company since July 1997, executive vice president from January
1997 until July 1997, vice president of power supply and energy transmission
from 1995 to 1997 and vice president of finance and chief financial
 
- ---------------
 
1 Crowell & Owens performed legal services for the Company in 1997 and will be
  retained to perform such services in 1998.
                                        2
   7
 
officer from 1993 to 1995. Prior to that time, he had served as vice president
of finance and rates, treasurer and chief financial officer. Mr. Eppler (age 47)
joined the Company in 1981 and served as manager, investor relations and finance
until 1985, when he became vice president of financial services.
 
     GREGORY L. NESBITT has served as chief executive officer of the Company
since July 1993 and has served as president since April 1992; he had served as chief
operating officer from July 1991 to June 1993 and as executive vice president from January
1988 to July
1991. Mr. Nesbitt (age 57)60) has been a director of the Company since 1988 and is
a member of the executive committee of the board of directors. He joined the
Company in 1980 and served as senior vice president of the Company's electric
power supply group until January 1988.
 
                               CONTINUING DIRECTORS
                             CLASS III DIRECTORS
                       (TERMS OF OFFICE EXPIRE IN 1997)

    J. PATRICK GARRETT has been engaged in the practice of law for more than
five years as a member of the law firm of Baker & Botts, L.L.P. Mr. Garrett (age
51) has served as a director of the Company since 1981.

    F. BEN JAMES, JR. has been president of James Investments, Inc., a company
primarily engaged in real estate development and international marketing, for
more than five years. Mr. James (age 59) has been a director of the Company
since 1986 and is chairman of the audit committee of the board of directors. He
is also a director of First Commerce Corporation.

    WILLIAM A. LOCKWOOD is a retired senior vice president of Citibank, N.A.
Before he retired in 1985, he was a senior vice president of Citibank, N.A. for
more than five years. Mr. Lockwood (age 71) has been a director of the Company
since 1982 and is chairman of the compensation committee and a member of the
executive committee of the board of directors.

    A. DELOACH MARTIN, JR. has been chairman of Central Engineering & Supply
Company, a company engaged in the wholesale distribution of refrigeration and
mill supplies, for more than five years. Mr. Martin (age 65) became a director
of the Company in 1978 and is chairman of the executive committee and a member
of the audit committee of the board of directors. He is also a director of
Galveston-Houston Company.

                              CLASS II DIRECTORS
 
                        (TERMS OF OFFICE EXPIRE IN 1996)1999)
 
     ROBERT T. RATCLIFF has been chairman, president and chief executive officer
of Ratcliff Construction Company, Inc., a company primarily engaged in the
design and construction of industrial, commercial and governmental facilities,
since 1975. Mr. Ratcliff (age 52)55) has been a director of the Company since 1993
and is a member of the audit committee of the board of directors. He is also a
director of Hibernia Corporation and Hibernia National Bank.
 
     EDWARD M. SIMMONS is presidentchairman of the board and chief executive officer of
McIlhenny Company (makers of TABASCOTabasco brand products). Prior to being named
chairman of the board in June 1996, Mr. Simmons had served as president and
has served in such positionschief executive officer of McIlhenny Company for more than five years. Mr.
Simmons (age 66)69) has been a director of the Company since 1992 and he previously
served on the Company's board of directors during the period 1971-1981. He is
chairman of the compensation committee and a member of the compensationexecutive committee
of the board of directors and also serves as a director of First

                                      3
 Commerce
Corporation, First National Bank of Commerce, Pan American Life Insurance
Company and Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.
 
     ERNEST L. WILLIAMSONWILLIAM H. WALKER, JR. is president and a retired chairmandirector of Howard, Weil,
Labouisse, Friedrichs Inc., an investment banking firm, and chief executive officer of
Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, a company primarily engagedhas served in the
explorationsuch
positions for and the development and production of petroleum natural
resources. Before he retired from Louisiana Land & Exploration Company in 1988,
he had served as chairman since 1985 and as chief executive officer since 1984.more than five years. Mr. WilliamsonWalker (age 70) became52) has been a director of
the Company in 1989since September 1996 and is a member of the executive committee and the compensationaudit committee of the
board of directors. He is also a director of HalliburtonHoward Weil Financial Corporation.
 
                              CLASS III DIRECTORS
 
                        (TERMS OF OFFICE EXPIRE IN 2000)
 
     J. PATRICK GARRETT has been president and chief executive officer of
Windsor Food Company Hibernia CorporationLtd., a privately held company engaged in the food
processing business, since July 1995. Prior to that time, he had been engaged in
the practice of law for more than five years as a member of the law firm of
Baker & Botts, L.L.P. Mr. Garrett (age 54) has served as a director of the
Company since 1981 and Louisiana Landis a member of the compensation committee of the board of
directors.
 
     F. BEN JAMES, JR. has been president of James Investments, Inc., a company
primarily engaged in real estate development and international marketing, for
more than five years. Mr. James (age 62) has been a director of the Company
since 1986 and is chairman of the audit committee and a member of the executive
committee of the board of directors. He is also a director of First Commerce
Corporation.
 
     A. DELOACH MARTIN, JR. has been chairman of Central Engineering & Exploration Company.Supply
Company, a company engaged in the wholesale distribution of refrigeration and
mill supplies, for more than five years. Mr. Martin (age 68) became a director
of the Company in 1978 and is chairman of the executive committee and a member
of the audit committee of the board of directors.
 
                                        3
   8
 
ORGANIZATION AND COMPENSATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
     The board of directors has an executive committee, (the "Executive
Committee"), an audit committee (the
"Audit Committee") and a compensation committee (the "Compensation Committee").
The members of such committees are identified under "Directors.""-- Directors" above. The
board of directors has no standing nominating committee.
 
     The Audit Committee recommends to the board of directors the appointment of
the independent auditors of the Company, reviews the scope of audits, reviews
and recommends to the board of directors financial reporting and accounting
practices, reviews the scope and results of the Company's procedures for
internal auditing and the adequacy of the system of internal accounting controlcontrols
of the Company, and has responsibility with respect to audit matters generally.
During 1994,1997, the Audit Committee held two meetings.
 
     The Compensation Committee approves, or in some cases recommends to the
board of directors, remuneration arrangements and compensation plans involving
the Company's directors, officers and employees, and administers the granting of
restricted stock and other awards to eligible employees under the Company's
long-term incentive compensation plan and annual incentive compensation program
described below. The Compensation Committee held twothree meetings in 1994.1997.
 
     The board of directors held four regular meetings and one special meeting
during 1994.1997. At intervals between formal meetings, members of the board are
provided with information regarding the operations of the Company and are
consulted informally from time to time with respect to pending business. During
1994,1997, all directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the
board of directors and of all of the committees of the board of directors on which such
directors served.
 
     The director who is a regularly employed officer of the Company receives no
fees for serving as a director of the Company. EachCurrently, each other director
who is not the chairman of a board committee receives an annual fee of $12,000
for serving as a director. The board of directors intends to approve, at its
meeting immediately following the annual meeting of shareholders, an increase in
the annual fee paid to outside directors to $18,000. Each director who is the
chairman of a board committee receives an additional annual fee of $3,000. Each
director receives $800 for each day he or she attends one or more meetings of
the board of directors or its committees. The Company also reimburses directors
for travel and related expenses incurred in attending meetings of the board of
directors or such committees. The Company has in effect a deferred compensation
plan for directors under which a director may elect to defer all or part of 4
his
or her compensation as a director. The Company has a retirement plan for its
non-employee directors under which directors with five years of service receive,
at age 65 or upon later retirement, an annual payment equal to the annual board
fee in effect at the time of retirement. In connection with the proposed
increase in the amount of the annual retainer paid to outside directors, the
board of directors intends to fix the annual retirement benefit for outside
directors at $12,000. Benefits are payable for life or a period equal to the
number of years of service as a director, whichever is shorter. The Company also
provides its non-employee directors with $200,000 of life insurance and
permanent total disability coverage under the Company's group accidental death
and dismemberment plan, which covers all active, full-time employees.
 
     COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

    Mr. Garrett,The board of directors has recently analyzed its directors' compensation
policy and in connection with such analysis intends to increase, effective after
the annual meeting of shareholders, the annual retainer paid to the Company's
outside directors from the current $12,000 annually to $18,000 annually, with
payment to be made, at the option of the director, in either cash, Common Stock
or a combination of both. In connection with this increase, the board intends to
fix the annual retirement benefit for outside directors at $12,000.
Additionally, the board of directors intends to adopt a policy that all outside
directors should own at least 1,000 shares of Common Stock (the "Stock Ownership
Policy"). The board of directors also intends to approve, subject to the
approval of shareholders, the following changes to its directors' compensation
policy.
 
     1. In connection with the Stock Ownership Policy, the Company's 1990
        Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Long-Term Plan") would be
        amended so that each outside director
 
                                        4
   9
 
        who serveddid not own at least 1,000 shares of Common Stock would receive the
        annual equivalent of $6,000 in the form of a vested interest in
        restricted Common Stock as a portion of his or her annual retainer, and
        the other $12,000 of retainer in cash. Once the outside director has
        accumulated at least 1,000 shares of Common Stock, the director may
        elect to receive all of his or her compensation in the form of cash or
        Common Stock or any combination thereof, and may elect to defer any or
        all of such compensation pursuant to the Company's Deferred Compensation
        Plan for Directors (the "Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan").
 
     2. The Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan would be amended to include an
        election to defer compensation in Common Stock. If Common Stock is
        chosen, that portion of the deferred compensation which is treated as
        invested in Common Stock would not be credited with interest, and any
        dividends on the Common Stock would be reinvested in deferred Common
        Stock.
 
     3. The Long-Term Plan would also be amended so that each outside director
        would be granted an option to purchase 2,500 shares of Common Stock with
        an exercise price at the then current market price upon his or her
        election or re-election to the board of directors and current outside
        directors would be granted an option to purchase a portion of 2,500
        shares of Common Stock prorated according to the number of years such
        director had remaining in his or her term on the board of directors.
 
For additional information regarding the proposed amendment to the Long-Term
Plan and to the Directors' Deferred Compensation Committee until April 1994, is a
member ofPlan relating to these changes
to the law firm of Baker & Botts, L.L.P., which performed legal servicesdirectors' compensation policy, see "Proposal to Approve the Amendment to
the 1990 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and the Related Amendment to the
Deferred Compensation Plan for the Company in 1994 and has been retained to perform such services in 1995.Directors."
 
                                        5
   10
 
                 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT
 
     The following table sets forth the number of shares of Common Stock and
$100 Preferred Stock beneficially owned as of February 1, 19951998 by each director
and nominee, each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation
Table below and all directors and executive officers as a group.
 
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF AMOUNT AND NATURE OF NATURE OFCOMMON STOCK(1) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP BENEFICIAL---------------------------------------------- OF COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP OF ------------------------------------------------ $100 PREFERRED OPTIONS STOCKSTOCK(2) EXERCISABLE ----------------------------------------- WITHIN PERCENT PERCENT DIRECT 60 DAYS OTHER OF CLASS INDIRECT OF CLASS ---------- ------------- ------ -------- ------------ ------- --------- -------- -------- DirectorsDIRECTORS AND NOMINEES Sherian G. Cadoria................. 0Cadoria............. 150 * Richard B. Crowell............. 20,516 49,540(3) * David M. Eppler (4)............ 18,061 2,800 400 * J. Patrick Garrett................. 10,031 900 *Garrett............. 2,000 * F. Ben James, Jr...................Jr............... 2,400 * * Hugh J. Kelly......................Kelly.................. 2,000 * * William A. Lockwood................ 2,794 * * A. DeLoach Martin, Jr.............. 18,960 *Jr.......... 19,200 * Gregory L. Nesbitt............. 32,938 5,000 (5)......... 49,631 2,000 * 218274 * Robert T. Ratcliff.................Ratcliff............. 1,000 * * Edward M. Simmons.................. 1,141Simmons.............. 1,359 * * Ernest L. Williamson...............William H. Walker, Jr.......... 1,000 * NAMED OFFICERS John L. Baltes, Jr............. 6,994 5,000 * Named Officers Robert L. Duncan................... 23,024 7,600285 * 194Darrell J. Dubroc.............. 2,472 * David M. Eppler.................... 11,100 8,600 6174 * 199Catherine C. Powell............ 4,455 * Leonard G. Fontenot................ 26,926 2,400 * 178 * David K. Warner.................... 16,736 9,000 * 190228 * All directors and executive officers as a group (18(19 persons, including those listed above)............................. 158,556 52,900 935 .95% 1,408 * (Footnotes on following page) 5 In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, shares are deemed to be "beneficially owned" by a person if such person directly or indirectly has or shares the power to vote or to dispose of the shares, regardless of whether such person has any economic interest in the shares. In addition, a person is deemed to own beneficially any shares of which such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days, as in the case of the stock options which are set forth under the "Options Exercisable Within 60 Days" column. Shares of Common Stock listed under the "Direct" column are those as to which each named individual or group has sole voting or dispositive power, including shares held under the Company's 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan (1,169 shares for Mr. Nesbitt, 128 shares for Mr. Eppler, 2,611 shares for Mr. Fontenot, and 194 shares for other executive officers included in the amount shown for all directors and executive officers as a group) and shares granted as restricted stock awards under the Company's long-term incentive compensation plan described below (7,078, 2,738, 2,984, 2,589 and 2,651 shares for Messrs. Nesbitt, Duncan, Eppler, Fontenot and Warner, respectively, and 4,507 shares for other executive officers included in the amount shown for all directors and executive officers as a group). Shares listed under the "Other" column are those as to which the named individual or group shares voting and dispositive power with another person. The shares of $100 Preferred Stock beneficially owned by the individuals and group indicated in the table are shares held for the respective accounts of executive officers under the Company's 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan. Mr. Nesbitt is also the President and Chief Executive Officer............... 143,909 15,800 49,540 % 2,142 *
- --------------- (1) In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, shares are deemed to be "beneficially owned" by a person if such person directly or indirectly has or shares the power to vote or to dispose of the shares, regardless of whether such person has any economic interest in the shares. In addition, a person is deemed to own beneficially any shares of which such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days, as in the case of the stock options which are set forth under the "Options Exercisable Within 60 Days" column. Shares of Common Stock listed under the "Direct" column are those as to which each named individual has sole voting or dispositive power, including shares held under the Company's 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan (548 shares for Mr. Dubroc and 1,282 shares for other executive officers included in the amount shown for all directors and executive officers as a group) and shares granted as restricted stock awards under the Company's long-term incentive compensation plan described below (13,444 shares for Mr. Nesbitt, 4,969 shares for Mr. Eppler, 3,135 shares for Ms. Powell, 1,924 shares for Mr. Dubroc, 2,083 shares for Mr. Baltes and 6,521 shares for other executive officers included in the amount shown for all directors and executive officers as a group). Shares listed under the "Other" column are those as to which the named individual shares voting and dispositive power with another person. (2) The shares of $100 Preferred Stock beneficially owned by the individuals indicated in the table are shares held for the respective accounts of executive officers under the ESOP Component of the Company's 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan. (3) Includes 5,000 shares which are owned by Mr. Crowell's wife, 26,844 shares which are owned by Mr. Crowell's children and with respect to which Mr. Robert D. Crowell, III acts as custodian, and 17,696 shares which are owned by trusts established for the benefit of Mr. Crowell's children and (Footnotes continued on following page) 6 11 with respect to which Mr. Robert D. Crowell, III acts as trustee. Mr. Crowell disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. (4) Mr. Eppler is also an executive vice president and the chief operating officer of the Company. (5) Mr. Nesbitt is also the president and chief executive officer of the Company. * Less than 1% of class. SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Section 16(a)"), requires the Company's executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the Company's equity securities. To the Company's knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no year-end reports on Form 5 were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994,1997, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its executive officers, directors and greater-than-10% shareholders were satisfied. 67 12 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION GENERAL The Summary Compensation Table sets forth individual compensation information with respect to the chief executive officer and the four other most highly paid executive officers of the Company for services rendered in all capacities to the Company during the fiscal years ended December 31, 1994,1997, December 31, 19931996 and December 31, 1992.1995. The table discloses the annual salary, bonuses and other compensation awards and payouts to the named executive officers.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LONG-TERM COMPENSATION ANNUAL COMPENSATION PAYOUTS -------------------------------------- --------- (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)------------ (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OTHER ALL ANNUAL COMPENSATIONOTHER COMPEN- LTIP ALL OTHERCOMPEN- NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS PAYOUTS COMPENSATIONBONUS(1) SATION(2) PAYOUTS(3) SATION(4) - --------------------------- ---- -------- -------- ------------ ---------- --------- Gregory L. Nesbitt................... 1994 $ 242,431 $ 66,000 $ 17,530 $ 54,476 $ 6,000Nesbitt.......... 1997 $296,770 $126,000 $16,840 $206,738 $6,334 President and Chief 1993 208,000 55,000 7,339 93,208 5,9961996 271,081 130,600 11,954 144,187 6,000 Executive Officer 1992 183,077 64,800 3,978 -- 5,8191995 258,796 94,800 10,546 146,135 17,000 David M. Eppler...................... 1994Eppler............. 1997 $166,478 $ 140,03154,000 $ 25,3005,837 $ 7,012 $ 27,343 $ 6,09868,238 $6,836 Executive Vice President - Finance 1993 132,687 26,200 3,948 48,138 5,364 1992 129,885 36,600 2,165 -- 5,258 Robert L. Duncan..................... 19941996 140,808 62,800 4,302 58,526 6,483 and Chief Operating 1995 140,807 49,956 4,446 72,970 6,442 Officer Catherine C. Powell......... 1997 $111,023 $ 124,20033,660 $ 31,9004,044 $ 6,584 $ 30,036 $ 6,84341,782 $6,188 Senior Vice President - Customer 1993 125,394 24,800 3,996 50,571 5,793 Operations 1992 123,831 34,800 2,296 -- 5,767 David K. Warner...................... 19941996 102,000 44,400 2,872 33,523 5,683 Employee and 1995 96,024 32,528 1,666 0 4,715 Corporate Services Darrell J. Dubroc........... 1997 $118,656 $ 121,30036,910 $ 31,3001,287 $ 5,487 $ 29,097 $ 6,0990 $9,964 Vice President - 1993 122,000 24,300 3,879 48,740 4,948 Administrative-- 1996 97,565 5,737 0 0 2,592 Generation Services 1992 120,938 34,000 2,219 -- 4,908 Leonard G. Fontenot.................. 19941995 90,184 0 0 0 7,877 John L. Baltes, Jr.......... 1997 $110,591 $ 121,44620,016 $ 22,0002,881 $ 5,975 $ 24,695 $ 7,257 Vice President - 1993 116,222 22,700 3,591 46,793 6,062 Power Supply and 1992 113,108 31,800 2,039 -- 5,985 Energy Transmission The "Bonus" column includes cash awards that are payable or have been paid to executive officers pursuant to an annual incentive compensation program under which participants may receive incentive compensation in addition to base compensation determined by the performance of the Company and the individual participants, and merit lump sum payments received by certain named officers in lieu of base salary increases. For 1992, 1993 and 1994, the "Other Annual Compensation" column includes long-term incentive plan compensation which represents dividends paid on restricted stock awards. Dividends on restricted stock are paid quarterly and at the same rate as dividends on the Common Stock. As permitted by the rules on executive officer and director compensation (Footnotes continued on following page) 7 disclosure, restricted stock awards granted under the Company's long-term incentive compensation plan, which are subject to performance-based vesting requirements, are reported under the "Long-Term Incentive Plan -- Awards in 1994" table below. The number and value of the aggregate restricted stock holdings at December 31, 1994, a portion of which is included in the "LTIP Payouts" column, for each of the named executive officers were as follows: Gregory L. Nesbitt, 5,581 shares with a value of $129,409; David M. Eppler, 2,801 shares with a value of $64,948; Robert L. Duncan, 2,643 shares with a value of $61,285; David K. Warner, 2,580 shares with a value of $59,824; and Leonard G. Fontenot, 2,455 shares with a value of $56,925. For 1994, the "Other Annual Compensation" column includes the amount paid to the named executive officers as reimbursement for payment of taxes incurred relating to future benefits accrued in 1994 pursuant to the Company's Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. For 1993 and 1994, the "LTIP Payouts" column includes the value of restricted stock and opportunity shares under the Company's long-term incentive compensation plan vested in 1994 relating to the performance period January 1, 1991 to December 31, 1993, and in28,434 $6,335 Controller 1996 105,586 25,800 2,165 25,488 5,938 1995 relating to the performance period January 1, 1992 to December 31, 1994, respectively, and related tax gross-up amounts. For 1992, 1993 and 1994, respectively, the "All Other Compensation" column includes: (i) amounts contributed or accrued by the Company under the Company's 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan on behalf of the named executive officers as follows: Gregory L. Nesbitt, $5,819, $5,996 and $6,000; David M. Eppler, $5,188, $5,292 and $5,999; Robert L. Duncan, $4,953, $4,977 and $6,000; David K. Warner, $4,838, $4,876 and $6,000; and Leonard G. Fontenot, $4,524, $4,598 and $5,766; and (ii) term life insurance premiums paid for the benefit of the named executive officers as follows: Gregory L. Nesbitt, $0, $0 and $0; David M. Eppler, $70, $72 and $99; Robert L. Duncan, $814, $816 and $843; David K. Warner, $70, $72 and $99; and Leonard G. Fontenot, $1,461, $1,464 and $1,491.101,308 17,400 2,444 45,171 9,551
- --------------- (1) The "Bonus" column includes cash awards that are payable or have been paid to executive officers pursuant to (i) an annual incentive compensation program under which participants may receive incentive compensation in addition to base compensation determined by the performance of the Company and the individual participants, (ii) merit lump-sum payments received by certain named executive officers, (iii) payments received by a certain named executive officer under the Employee Incentive Plan (prior to election as an executive officer) and (iv) payments received under the Company's spot award incentive plan which rewards individual performance. (2) For 1995, 1996 and 1997, the "Other Annual Compensation" column includes long-term incentive plan compensation which represents dividends paid on restricted stock awards. Dividends on restricted stock are paid quarterly and at the same rate as dividends on the Common Stock. As permitted by the rules on executive officer compensation disclosure, restricted stock awards granted under the Company's long-term incentive compensation plan, which are subject to performance-based vesting requirements, are reported under the "Long-Term Incentive Plan -- Awards in 1997" table below. The number and value of the aggregate restricted stock holdings at December 31, 1997, a portion of which is included in the "LTIP Payouts" column, for each of the (Footnotes continued on following page) 8 13 named executive officers were as follows: Gregory L. Nesbitt, 10,516 shares with a value of $340,456; David M. Eppler, 3,650 shares with a value of $118,169; Catherine C. Powell, 2,531 shares with a value of $81,941; Darrell J. Dubroc, 820 shares with a value of $26,548; and John L. Baltes, Jr., 1,802 shares with a value of $58,340. (3) For 1995, 1996 and 1997, the "LTIP Payouts" column includes the value of restricted stock and opportunity shares under the Company's long-term incentive compensation plan vested in 1996 relating to the performance period January 1, 1993 to December 31, 1995, in 1997 relating to the performance period January 1, 1994 to December 31, 1996, and in 1998 relating to the performance period January 1, 1995 to December 31, 1997, respectively, and related tax gross-up amounts. (4) For 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively, the "All Other Compensation" column includes: (i) amounts contributed or accrued by the Company under the Company's 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan on behalf of the named executive officers as follows: Gregory L. Nesbitt, $6,000, $6,000 and $6,334; David M. Eppler, $6,000, $6,000 and $6,333; Catherine C. Powell, $4,594, $5,488 and $5,973; Darrell J. Dubroc, $2,477, $2,547 and $4,881; and John L. Baltes, Jr., $4,489, $4,999 and $5,376; (ii) term life insurance premiums paid for the benefit of the named executive officers as follows: Gregory L. Nesbitt, $0, $0 and $0; David M. Eppler, $442, $483 and $503; Catherine C. Powell, $121, $195 and $215; Darrell J. Dubroc, $0, $45 and $71; and John L. Baltes, Jr., $412, $939 and $959; and (iii) unused vacation purchased from the following named executives: Gregory L. Nesbitt, $11,000, $0 and $0; David M. Eppler, $0, $0 and $0; Catherine C. Powell, $0, $0 and $0; Darrell J. Dubroc, $5,400, $0 and $5,012; and John L. Baltes, Jr., $4,650, $0 and $0. STOCK OPTION PLANS The Company currently maintains two plans pursuant to which options to purchase shares of Common Stock are outstanding or available for future grants. The Company's 1981 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the "Stock Option Plan"), covering an aggregate of 800,000 shares of Common Stock, expired in 1991 and no future grants can be made under this plan. As of February 1, 1995,1998, options covering 58,45015,800 shares remained to be exercised pursuant to grants made under the Stock Option Plan. The Company has in effect a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which certain officers and key employees may receive stock options or stock appreciation rights. This plan is discussed in greater detail under the section "Long-Term Incentive Plan" below. No stock options were granted under the long-term incentive compensation planLong-Term Plan in 1994.1997. Although the long-term incentive compensation planLong-Term Plan permits grants of stock appreciation rights, no such rights had been granted as of December 31, 1994. 8 1997. The following table sets forth, for each of the persons listed in the Summary Compensation Table, certain information concerning stock options exercised during 1994.1997. The table also discloses information concerning unexercised stock options held at December 31, 1994.1997. AGGREGATE OPTION EXERCISES IN 1997 AND 1997 YEAR-END OPTION VALUES - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGGREGATE OPTION EXERCISES IN 1994 AND 1994 YEAR-END OPTION VALUES (A) (B) (C) (D) (E)(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT OPTIONS AT SHARES DECEMBER 31, 1994(#)1996(#) DECEMBER 31, 19941996 ACQUIRED ON VALUE -------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ NAME EXERCISE (#) REALIZEDEXERCISE(#) REALIZED(1) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLEEXERCISABLE(1) UNEXERCISABLE ---- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- -------------- ------------- Gregory L. Nesbitt................... 1,000Nesbitt..... 0 $ 7,3450 2,000 0 $31,190 $0 David M. Eppler........ 0 0 2,800 0 43,666 0 Catherine C. Powell ..................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 Darrell J. Dubroc...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 John L. Baltes, Jr..... 0 0 5,000 0 $ 32,038 $ 0 David M. Eppler...................... 2,500 21,250 8,600 0 60,383 0 Robert L. Duncan..................... 2,000 16,875 8,380 0 55,278 0 David K. Warner...................... 2,000 19,750 9,000 0 61,728 0 Leonard G. Fontenot.................. 2,600 14,872 2,400 0 15,378 0 Based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange -- Composite Transactions on the exercise date and at year-end, respectively,77,975 0
- --------------- (1) Based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape at December 31, 1997, minus the exercise price. 9 14 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN The Company has in effect a long-term incentive compensation plan (the "Long-Term Plan"), pursuant to which certain officers and key employees may receive stock incentives and/or cash incentives based on the value of the Common Stock. Five types of awards may be granted under the Long-Term Plan: (i) stock awards consisting of restricted stock and "opportunity shares" which may be awarded in connection with restricted stock awards; (ii) restricted unit awards consisting of Common Stock equivalent units and "opportunity units" which may be awarded in connection with restricted unit awards; (iii) nonstatutory stock options or incentive stock options; (iv) stock appreciation rights attached to stock options; and (v) stock appreciation rights not attached to stock options. An aggregate of 800,000 shares of Common Stock, or cash equivalents of Common Stock, may be issued pursuant to the Long-Term Plan (such number being subject to antidilution adjustments under certain circumstances). Plan participants, awards to participants, performance measurement periods and performance goals are determined by the Compensation Committee. Upon a change of control of the Company or merger or similar transaction involving the Company, all restrictions imposed on awards under the Long-Term Plan will lapse, all unvested rights will vest and all stock options and similar rights granted under the plan will become fully exercisable, subject to certain limitations imposed by the Long-Term Plan. 9 The following table sets forth, for each of the persons listed in the Summary Compensation Table, information as to long-term incentive plan awards granted under the Long-Term Plan during 1994.1997.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN-AWARDSPLAN -- AWARDS IN 19941997 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS (C) --------------------------------------------- (E) (F) PERFORMANCE OR (D) NUMBER OF NUMBER OF (B)------------------------------------------ OTHER PERIOD UNTIL NUMBER OF TARGET MAXIMUM (A)NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF MATURATION OR THRESHOLD SHARES SHARESTARGET MAXIMUM NAME SHARES (#)SHARES(#)(1) PAYOUT SHARES (#) (#) (#)SHARES(#)(2) SHARES(#)(2) SHARES(#)(3) ---- ------------ ------------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Gregory L. Nesbitt................... 1,974Nesbitt...... 4,887 1/1/94-12/97-12/31/96 494 1,974 2,96199 1,222 4,887 7,330 David M. Eppler...................... 853Eppler......... 1,759 1/1/94-12/97-12/31/96 213 853 1,280 Robert99 440 1,759 2,639 Catherine C. Powell..... 1,218 1/1/97-12/31/99 305 1,218 1,827 Darrell J. Dubroc....... 820 1/1/97-12/31/99 205 820 1,230 John L. Duncan..................... 753Baltes, Jr...... 805 1/1/94-12/97-12/31/96 188 753 1,129 David K. Warner...................... 735 1/1/94-12/31/96 184 735 1,103 Leonard G. Fontenot.................. 740 1/1/94-12/31/96 185 740 1,110 The amounts under column (B) "Number of Shares" represent the target level of performance-based restricted stock awards granted to the named executive officers in 1994, as reflected in column (E) "Number of Target Shares." For further information concerning these awards and the award of "opportunity shares" granted in connection with the restricted stock, see the discussion under footnotes 2 and 3 below. The amounts under columns (D) "Number of Threshold Shares" and (E) "Number of Target Shares" represent performance-based restricted stock awards granted to the named executive officers in 1994 that will vest under the threshold and target levels established by the Compensation Committee. The restricted stock awards vest based on total return to shareholders (Common Stock price appreciation plus dividends paid during performance cycle) in relation (by percentile) to a peer group of other utilities ("Total Return to Shareholders"). The vesting (payout) schedule for the restricted stock awards set forth under these two columns, based on the Company's Total Return to Shareholders ranking, is as follows: (a) No awards vest if the Company's ranking is below 25th percentile. (b) Threshold performance provides 25% award payout at 25th percentile. (c) Target performance provides 100% award payout from 45th percentile to 55th percentile. Performance awards above the threshold level and below the target level will be prorated. The recipient of a restricted stock award is the record owner of the number of target shares awarded, which are issued in the name of the recipient but held in escrow by the Company until delivery to or forfeiture by the recipient. The recipient may vote the shares covered by the award and receives dividends with respect thereto, but generally may not sell, pledge or otherwise transfer such shares until the restriction period imposed by the Compensation Committee comes to an end and the performance goals established by the committee have been met. The recipient may, at the end of the restriction period, forfeit all or a portion of the restricted shares awarded depending on the performance level achieved. The restriction period for restricted stock awarded during 1994 is three years from the date of grant (January 1997). The restricted stock awards require an additional three-year holding period following vesting before any shares may be sold. (Footnotes continued on following page) 10 The amounts under column (F) "Number of Maximum Shares" represent the number of performance-based restricted stock awards that vest at the target level set forth under column (E) "Number of Target Shares" PLUS the number of performance-based "opportunity shares" granted to the named executive officers in 199499 201 805 1,208
- --------------- (1) The amounts under column (b) "Number of Shares" represent the target level of performance-based restricted stock awards granted to the named executive officers in 1997, as reflected in column (e) "Number of Target Shares." For further information concerning these awards and the award of "opportunity shares" granted in connection with the restricted stock, see the discussion under footnotes 2 and 3 below. (2) The amounts under columns (d) "Number of Threshold Shares" and (e) "Number of Target Shares" represent performance-based restricted stock awards granted to the named executive officers in 1997 that will vest under the threshold and target levels established by the Compensation Committee. The restricted stock awards vest based on total return to shareholders (Common Stock price appreciation plus dividends paid during performance cycle) in relation (by percentile) to a peer group of other utilities ("Total Return to Shareholders"). The vesting (payout) schedule for the restricted stock awards set forth under these two columns, based on the Company's Total Return to Shareholders ranking, is as follows: (a) No awards vest if the Company's ranking is below the 25th percentile. (b) Threshold performance provides 25% award payout at the 25th percentile. (c) Target performance provides 100% award payout from the 45th percentile to the 55th percentile. Performance awards above the threshold level and below the target level will be prorated. (Footnotes continued on following page) 10 15 The recipient of a restricted stock award is the record owner of the number of target shares awarded, which are issued in the name of the recipient but held in escrow by the Company until delivery to or forfeiture by the recipient. The recipient may vote the shares covered by the award and receive dividends with respect thereto, but generally may not sell, pledge or otherwise transfer such shares until the restriction period imposed by the Compensation Committee comes to an end and the performance goals established by the committee have been met. The recipient may, at the end of the restriction period, forfeit all or a portion of the restricted shares awarded depending on the performance level achieved. The restriction period for restricted stock awarded during 1997 is three years from the date of grant (January 2000). The restricted stock awards require an additional three-year holding period following vesting before any shares may be sold. (3) The amounts under column (f) "Number of Maximum Shares" represent the number of performance-based restricted stock awards that vest at the target level set forth under column (e) "Number of Target Shares" plus the number of performance-based "opportunity shares" granted to the named executive officers in 1997 that will vest between the target and maximum levels established by the Compensation Committee. The "opportunity shares" vest based on Total Return to Shareholders and will be issued when the restriction period on the associated restricted stock awards lapses. The vesting (payout) schedule for the "opportunity shares" included in this column, based on the Company's Total Return to Shareholders ranking, is as follows: (a) No awards of "opportunity shares" vest if the Company's ranking is at or below the 55th percentile. (b) Maximum performance provides 100% "opportunity share" award payout (equal to 50% of number of target shares of restricted stock) at the 75th percentile. Performance awards of "opportunity shares" above the target level and below the maximum level will be prorated. "Opportunity shares" awarded in connection with a restricted stock award will not be issued until the lapse of restrictions on the related restricted stock and do not entitle the recipient to the rights of a shareholder with respect to the "opportunity shares" until the time of issuance of the Common Stock representing the "opportunity shares." Provisions of the "opportunity share" awards require an additional three-year holding period following vesting before any of the shares may be sold. PENSION PLAN The Company has in effect a pension plan and related trust (the "Pension Plan"), covering substantially all employees of the Company, under which the Company makes such contributions as are actuarially necessary to provide for the retirement benefits established under the plan. Benefits are based on employees' earnings, length of service, age at retirement, payment form elected, application of statutory benefit limits, and certain other factors, and are payable upon normal retirement at age 65, upon early retirement beginning at age 55 or after termination of employment under certain circumstances. Annual benefits under the Pension Plan are limited to the maximum amount prescribed by sections 415 and 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). For 1995,1998, the annual compensation of each employee which is to be taken into account under the Pension Plan cannot exceed $150,000,$160,000, and the maximum allowable pension benefit for the plan is limited to $120,000.$130,000. Payments to retired employees under the Pension Plan are not reduced for Social Security benefits or other offsetting amounts. In addition, effective July 1, 1992, the Company established a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "SERP") for the benefit of certain participants designated by the Compensation Committee. The SERP provides participants who have completed ten years of service and terminated employment after reaching age 65 with a right to monthly payments for the life of the participant and surviving spouse equal to 65% of final average compensation, reduced by the Pension Plan benefit and benefits under other previous employer pension plans. The SERP also provides adjusted benefits for early retirement on 11 16 or after age 55 with ten years of service, for termination of service due to disability and for beneficiaries in the event of the death of the participant. The SERP, as amended and restated effective January 1, 1996, provides that the Chief Executive Officer or the Compensation Committee may prescribe a shorter period of service as a condition for normal or early retirement or entitlement to receive a benefit upon termination of employment prior to early retirement age, which shall be set forth in a written agreement between the participant and the Compensation Committee. The Company has in effect written agreements prescribing shorter periods of service for Ms. Powell and one other executive officer of the Company. Benefits under the SERP are payable out of the Company's general funds. The 11 SERP participants in 19941997 were the five individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table and threefour other executive officers of the Company. Under the Pension Plan, eligible remuneration for purposes of determining the annual pension benefit payable to a participant upon retirement is based upon the average of the five consecutive years (of the participant's last ten years of employment) during which the participant received his or her highest amount of remuneration from the Company. Under the SERP, eligible remuneration is based on the sum of the highest annual salary paid during the five years prior to termination of employment and the average of the three highest annual incentive compensation program awards paid to the participant during the preceding five years. The remuneration covered by the Pension Plan and the SERP consists of salaries and bonuses paid to Pension Plan and SERP participants, including the salaries and bonuses set forth in columns (C)(c) and (D)(d) of the Summary Compensation Table. The estimated annual benefits payable upon retirement at normal retirement age under the Pension Plan and the SERP for Messrs.Mr. Nesbitt, Mr. Eppler, Duncan, WarnerMs. Powell, Mr. Dubroc and FontenotMr. Baltes would be approximately $197,837, $111,322, $106,535, $104,217$269,037, $144,341, $96,126, $86,887 and $96,793,$86,556, respectively. These amounts are based on the assumption that these executive officers will continue to work for the Company until their normal retirement age 65 and that their earnings in the five years prior to such retirement will be the same, respectively, as their earnings during the past five years. LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN The Company maintains a long-term disability plan that provides disability benefits up to 60% of salary or a maximum of $7,500 per month for all active full-time employees with two or more years of service. These benefits are provided for the first 24 months out of the Company's general funds, and thereafter pursuant to an insurance contract under which premiums are paid by the Company. SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS The Company has severance agreements with Messrs.Mr. Nesbitt, Mr. Eppler, Duncan, WarnerMs. Powell, Mr. Dubroc and FontenotMr. Baltes and threefour other executive officers of the Company. The agreement for each such officer provides generally for payment of a minimum annual salary equal to such executive officer's current annual base salary, participation in all Company benefit plans and programs applicable to the Company's executive officers and reimbursement of employment-related expenses incurred while performing such officer's duties. Under the severance agreements, the base salaries for 19951998 for Messrs.Mr. Nesbitt, Mr. Eppler, Duncan, WarnerMs. Powell, Mr. Dubroc and FontenotMr. Baltes are $260,000, $140,800, $127,900, $121,300$325,000, $200,000, $125,000, $143,000 and $122,100,$111,200, respectively. The severance agreements havehad an initial term of three years ending on July 1, 1995, with continuously renewing one-year extensions thereafter, unless either the Company or the executive officer gives notice prior to such extension that such officer's term of employment will not be extended. The severance agreements include provisions governing reductions in salary or duties, termination of employment and change in control. Generally, if the executive's employment is terminated (i) by the Company for any reason other than a material breach by the executive (as defined in the agreements) or (ii) by the executive following a reduction in base salary (other than a reduction in pay uniformly applicable to all officers) or a significant reduction in the 12 executive's authority, duties or responsibilities, the executive is entitled to receive, as severance pay, an amount equal to his or her annual base salary at the time of termination. The executive is also entitled to continued health plan coverage for up to 18 months after such termination. The executive is also entitled to require the Company to (i) purchase his or her principal residence (if it is located within 60 miles of the Company's Pineville office) for an amount equal to the greater of (x) the purchase price of the residence plus the cost of capital 12 17 improvements or (y) the fair market value of the residence, and (ii) pay or reimburse the executive for relocation costs. Generally, in the event a change in control occurs and within three years after such change in control the executive's employment is terminated by the Company for reasons other than a material breach by the executive (as defined in the agreements) or the executive terminates his or her employment for good reason (as defined in the agreements), the Company will pay the executive, in lieu of any severance obligation otherwise payable under the severance agreement, an amount equal to three times the executive's average compensation paid during the five calendar years preceding the change in control. In the event of a change in control, payments under the agreements for the individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table, using compensation for the years 19901993 through 1994,1997, would be approximately as follows: Mr. Nesbitt, $564,203;$1,055,765; Mr. Eppler, $374,864;$568,298; Ms. Powell, $333,815; Mr. Duncan, $375,575; Mr. Warner, $359,924;Dubroc, $280,604; and Mr. Fontenot, $340,172.Baltes, $363,857. However, the severance agreements limit the amount payable upon a change in control to an amount that would not result in the disallowance of a deduction to the Company under the "golden parachute" provisions of the Code or the imposition of an excise tax on the employee under Section 4999 of the Code. The severance agreements also generally require the executives not to disclose confidential information relating to the Company and, for a period of one year after termination, not to hire Company officers, employees or agents, or solicit or divert any customer or supplier of the Company. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The Compensation Committee (in this report, the "Committee") has prepared its report of 19941997 executive compensation. The Committee, composed entirely of directors who are not current or former officers or employees of the Company, is responsible for implementing or making recommendations to the board of directors, with respect to the Company's officer compensation programs. The Committee has retained the services of executive compensation consultants to provide professional assistance, data and advice regarding pay practices at the Company. This report describes the basis on which such 19941997 compensation determinations or recommendations were made by the Committee with respect to the Company's executive officers. This report, required by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, provides specific information regarding compensation of the Company's Presidentpresident and Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer (the "Chief Executive Officer") and general information regarding compensation of the Company's executive officers as a group. The Chief Executive Officer and four other most highly compensated executive officers are sometimes referred to as the "Named Executives." Section 162(m) of the Code limits to $1,000,000 in a taxable year, the deduction publicly held companies may claim for compensation paid to an executive officer, unless certain 13 requirements are met. The Company has reviewed this provision and has determined that the Company is not affected by Section 162(m) because no compensation paid to any executive officer currently approaches or is expected to approach $1,000,000 in the near term. Accordingly, no change to any of the compensation plans areis contemplated at this time. COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OVERALL OBJECTIVE OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAMSCompensation Philosophy and Overall Objective of Executive Compensation Programs The Company seeks to ensure that executive compensation is directly linked to corporate performance and shareholder value, as well as comparable pay practices in the industry. Each year, the Committee, in making compensation decisions and recommendations, and the board of directors, in approving base salaries, review the performance of the Company and compare such performance to specified internal and external performance standards. The Committee has developed the following compensation guidelines as the principles upon which compensation decisions and recommendations are made: o Provide a competitive total compensation package that enables the Company to attract and retain key executives. o- Provide variable compensation opportunities that are linked to the financial performance of the Company and that align executive compensation with the interests of shareholders. o13 18 - Provide incentives to increase corporate performance and shareholder value relative to those of other electric utilities. COMPENSATION PROGRAM COMPONENTS- Establish executive officer base pay levels somewhat below the competitive market, while providing incentive awards (from the annual and long-term plans) above the market, provided that performance objectives are achieved. - Provide a competitive total compensation package that is "at-risk" driven and enables the Company to attract and retain key executives. Compensation Program Components The compensation program for executive officers is currently comprised of base salary, annual performance-related incentives and performance-based awards of restricted stock and related "opportunity shares" granted under the Long-Term Plan, as discussed above under "Long-Term Incentive Plan." In addition, certain of the executive officers have stock options outstanding that were granted under the Stock Option Plan, which expired in 1991 and under which no future grants can be made. See "Stock Option Plans." The compensation programs for the Company's executive officers are further explained below. o BASE SALARY- Base Salary -- Base pay levels recommended by the Committee are largely determined through comparisons with those of other electric utilities of similar size and complexity to the Company. These companies, as well as other electric utilities, are included in the Edison Electric Institute Index of approximately 100 investor-owned electric utilities (the "Edison Electric Institute Index") graphed in the performance graph shown elsewhere. Actual salaries are based on individual performance contributions within a salary structure that is established through job evaluation and market comparisons. While the actual relationship may vary from year to year, it is the Company's policy to have base pay levels for the Company's executive officers, including the Named Executives, to be at or slightlysomewhat below the average of the competitive market. Including 19941997 base salary increases, actual base pay levels for the Company's executive officers, including the Named Executives, are consistent with this policy. Increases in base salary for 19941997 to continuing executive officers were recommended by the Committee and approved by the board of directors in January 1994.1997. In 1994January 1997, the base salaries of the executive officers,Named Executives, other than the Chief 14 Executive Officer (see "1994"1997 Compensation for the President and Chief Executive Officer -- Base Salary" below)), received pay increases (including a promotional adjustment that reflected an increase in job responsibilities) that averaged 10%. During 1997, three individuals were promoted to officers, and two other executive officers, were increased from between 3%their compensation was adjusted in accordance with their new responsibilities. One of the Named Executives was promoted to 9.6%. The two other executive officers did not receiveChief Operating Officer and his base salary increases in 1994. o ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATIONpay was accordingly increased. - Annual Incentive Compensation -- The Company's executive officers are eligible to participate in an annual incentive compensation program with awards generally based on earnings per share goals and the Company's actual return on equity in relation to that of the Edison Electric Institute Index, a peer group of approximately 100 electric utilities. Earnings per share and return on equity goals are generally of equal weight. Based on actual results, awards from 0% to 150% of target incentive levels may be made. For 1994,awards based on 1997 performance, the earnings per share target was $2.00 and the$2.20. The Company's return on equity target was the 50th to 59th percentile of the Edison Electric Institute Index. The Company's 1994actual 1997 return on equity performance was in the 60th50th to 74th59th percentile of the Edison Electric Institute Index, and its primary earnings per share in 19941997 was $1.92.$2.24. Based on the earnings per share and return on equity financial performance, the Committee approved actual awards for 19941997 at 90%100% of target annual bonus levels. The objective of the annual incentive compensation program is to deliver competitive levels of compensation (I.E.(i.e., average award levels comparablecompared to the Company's competitive peer group) for the attainment of short-term financial objectives that the Committee believes are primary determinants of shareholder value over time, and to reinforce behaviors that contribute to consistent growth of the enterprise. The Committee bases target annual bonus levels on average 14 19 competitive bonus levels among other electric utility companies of similar size and complexity. These companies are included in the Edison Electric Institute Index. Targeted awards for executive officers of the Company under this program range from 10%18% to 30%42% of base salary. Awards are paid in the first quarter of the year following the year for which the award is earned. The amounts of actual awards are further subject to the discretion of the Committee, within established program guidelines (I.E.(i.e., the ability of the Committee to make adjustments to reflect extraordinary items of income or expense). Two executive officers, whose base salaries were already at the average of the competitive market, received merit lump sum payments in 1994 in lieu of increases in base salary. The merit lump sum payments for 1994 to such executive officers were recommended by the Committee and approved by the board of directors in January 1994. These merit lump sum payments averaged 8% of base salary and were paid in February 1994 in order to recognize the individual performance and team contributions of each of these executive officers. o LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN- Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan -- The Committee supports increased stock ownership by key executives of the Company and favors awards to key executives of stock and/or cash, based on the Company's stock price appreciation and other measures of performance. The basis for such position is the Committee's belief that the Company benefits by providing those persons who have substantial responsibility for the management and growth of the Company with additional incentives by increasing their proprietary interest in the success of the Company orand by awardingrewarding those persons for increases in the Company's stock price or the achievement of other long-term performance goals forof the Company. Thus, under the Long-Term Plan, executive officers may be eligible to receive performance-based grants of restricted stock, related "opportunity shares," 15 restricted unit grant awards, related "opportunity units," stock options and stock appreciation rights, giving them the right to receive or purchase shares of Common Stock under specified circumstances or to receive cash awards based on the Company's stockCommon Stock price appreciation or the achievement of pre-established long-term performance goals. The Committee believes that such programs are also important as a means of retaining senior management over the long term. The number of shares of stockCommon Stock and other awards granted to executive officers under the Long-Term Plan is based on competitive compensation practices (i.e., compensation practices of other utilities that constitute the Edison Electric Institute Index). Grants and awards of restricted stock andas well as awards of related "opportunity shares" under the Long-Term Plan were made to all executive officers in 1994.1997. Awards to executive officers are based on a competitive compensation analysis (i.e., target levels comparable to compensation levelspractices of other utilities that constitute the Edison Electric Institute Index). Awards actually earned are based on the Company's performance during a three-year performance cycle compared to the other electric utilities in the Edison Electric Institute Index. The first grants of restricted stock and "opportunity shares" underIndex over the Long-Term Plan were made in 1991; such grants vested in 1994.same period. For the secondfifth three-year performance cycle which ended December 31, 1994,1997, the Company's Total Returntotal return to Shareholdersshareholders placed it at the 54th43rd percentile compared to the Edison Electric Institute Index, thus meetingIndex. As a result, the objectives, as specifiedactual awards were reduced below target in order to reflect the Long-Term Plan, for such performance cycle.Company's relative performance. Provisions of the restricted stock and "opportunity share" grants require an additional three-year holding period following vesting before any shares may be sold. No other types of awards under the Long-Term Plan were made to executive officers in 1994. OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS1997, and no awards of performance-based restricted stock vested during 1997. Other Executive Compensation Plans The Company also provides executive officers with certain executive benefits, such as a supplemental retirement plan and severance agreements. The Committee considers each of these programs to be reasonably competitive and appropriate for executive officers of the Company. 1994 COMPENSATION FOR THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER In light of1997 Compensation for the Committee's stated philosophyPresident and compensation plans which it administers on behalf of key executives, theChief Executive Officer The Committee believes that the role of the Chief Executive Officer is particularly important in reaching corporate goals and accomplishing organizational objectives. As such, for fiscal year 1994,1997 the Committee made the following recommendations or determinations regarding the compensation for Mr. Nesbitt: o BASE SALARY --- Base Salary. Mr. Nesbitt'sNesbitt is president and chief executive officer of the Company. His base salary was increased in January 19941997 from $220,000$272,000 to $244,300,$300,000, an increase of approximately 11%10%. The amount of this increase was based on the continued performance of Mr. Nesbitt as evaluated 15 20 by the Committee. Even with this adjustment, his base pay is significantly below peers in the industry. o ANNUAL INCENTIVE --- Annual Incentive. Mr. Nesbitt was eligible to participate in 19941997 in the Company's annual incentive compensation program discussed in this report above (see "Annual" -- Annual Incentive Compensation"). The Chief Executive Officer's 19941997 target award was 30% of 16 his base salary and his actual award of $66,000 was 27% (90% of his target)42% of his base salary. o LONG-TERM INCENTIVE --His actual award for 1997 was 100% of target. - Long-Term Incentive. Awards were made to Mr. Nesbitt under the Long-Term Plan during 1994.1997. The number of shares of stock and other awards granted to the Chief Executive Officer under the Long-Term Plan is based on competitive practices within the industry. Administration is consistent with the provisions of the plan as described above in "Long-Term Incentive Plan." For the three-year performance cycle ended December 31, 1994,1997, the Chief Executive Officer's award was 100%92.5% of target or 1,3062,593 shares. SUMMARYSummary The Committee believes that base-paybase pay levels and increases and performance- basedperformance-based awards are reasonable and competitive with the compensation programs provided to officers and other executives by electric utilities of similar size and complexity to the Company. The Committee believes further that the degree of performance sensitivity in the annual incentive program continues to be reasonable, yielding awards that are directly linked to the annual financial and operational results of the Company. The Long-Term Plan continues to provide, in the view of the Committee, financial opportunities to participants and retention features for the Company that are consistent with the relative returns that are generated on behalf of the Company's shareholders. The Compensation Committee William A. Lockwood,Edward M. Simmons, Chairman Sherian G. Cadoria, Brig. General (retired) Edward M. Simmons Ernest L. Williamson 17J. Patrick Garrett Hugh J. Kelly 16 21 PERFORMANCE GRAPH The following performance graph compares the performance of the Common Stock to the S&P 500 Index and to the Edison Electric Institute Index (which includes the Company) for the Company's last five fiscal years. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in the Common Stock and each index was $100 at December 31, 19891992 and that all dividends were reinvested. [LINE GRAPH PLOTTED FROM POINTS IN TABLE BELOW] ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON DECEMBER 31, 1989 IN CLECO COMMON STOCK, S&P 500 INDEX AND EEI INDEX. DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------------------------------- 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- CLECO............ $100 $108 $157 $163 $177 $177 S&P 500 Index.... $100 $ 97 $126 $136 $150 $152 EEI Index.... $100 $101 $131 $141 $156 $138
Measurement Period (Fiscal Year Covered) CLECO S&P 500 Index EEI Index 1992 100 100 100 1993 108 110 111 1994 108 112 098 1995 133 153 129 1996 145 189 130 1997 180 252 166
(1) The EEIEdison Electric Institute Index is comprised of: Allegheny Power System, Inc.; American Electric Power Company, Inc.; Atlantic Energy, Inc.; Baltimore Gas & Electric Company; Bangor Hydro-Electric Company; Black Hills Corporation; Boston Edison Company; Carolina Power & Light Company; Centerior Energy Corporation; Central & South West Corporation; Central Hudson Gas & Electric;Electric Corporation; Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc.; Central Maine Power Company; Central Vermont Public Service Corporation; Central & South West Corporation; Cilcorp Inc.; CINergy Corp. 18 (formed by the merger of Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. and PSI Resources, Inc.); Cipsco Inc.; CMS Energy Corp.; Commonwealth Energy System; Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.; Delmarva Power & Light Co.; Detroit Edison Company; Dominion Resources, Inc.; DPL Inc.; DQE Inc.; DTE Energy Co.; Duke Energy Corporation (formerly known as Duke Power Company;Company); Eastern Utilities Associates; Edison International; El Paso ElectricalElectric Company; Empire District Electric Company; Enova Corp.; Entergy Corporation; ESELCO Inc.; FirstEnergy Corp. (a holding company formed by the business combination of Centerior Energy Corporation and Ohio Edison Company); Florida Progress Corporation; FPL Group, Inc.; General Public Utilities Corporation; Green Mountain Power Corporation; Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.; Houston Industries Incorporated; Idaho Power Company; IES Industries, Inc.; Illinova Corp. (newly formed holding company of Illinois Power Company); Interstate Power Co.; Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.; IPALCO Enterprises Inc.; Kansas City Power & Light Company; KU Energy Corp.; LG&E Energy Corp.; Long Island Lighting Company; Madison Gas & Electric Co.; Maine Public Service Company; MidwestMDU Resources Group, Inc.; MidAmerican Energy Holding Company; Minnesota Power & Light Co.; Montana Power Co.; Nevada Power Company; New Century Energies, Inc. (a holding company formed by the business combination of Public Service Co. of Colorado and Southwestern Public Service Co.); New England Electric System; New York State Electric & Gas Corporation; Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.; NIPSCO Industries, Inc.; Northeast Utilities; Northern States Power Co. (MN); Northwestern Public Service Co.; Ohio Edison Company; Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company; Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.; Otter Tail Power Company; Pacific Gas & Electric Co.; Pacificorp; Peco Energy Co. (formerly Philadelphia Electric Company); Pennsylvania Power & Light Company; Pinnacle West Capital Corp.; Portland General Corporation; Potomac Electric Power Corporation; Public Service Co. of Colorado;PP&L Resources Inc.; Public Service Company of New Mexico; Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated; Puget Sound Power & Light Company;Energy, Inc.; Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation; San Diego Gas & Electric Co.; SCANA Corp.; SCECORP; Sierra Pacific Resources; SIGCORP; Southern Company; Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.; Southwestern Public Service Company; St. Joseph Light & Power Co.; TECO Energy, Inc.; Texas Utilities Company; TNP Enterprises, Inc.; Tucson Electric Power Company; Unicom Corp. (newly formed holding company of Commonwealth Edison Co.); Union Electric Co.; United Illuminating Company; Unitil Corp.; Upper Peninsula Energy Corp.; Utilicorp United Inc.; Washington Water Power Co.; Western Resources, Inc.; Wisconsin Energy Corporation; WPL Holdings Inc.; and WPS Resources Corp. (newly formed holding company of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation); and WPL Holdings Inc. Gulf States Utilities Co.,Portland General Corporation, which was acquired by Entergy Corporationmerged into Enron Corp. during 1994,1997, was deleted from, and MDU Resources Group, Inc. and El Paso Electric Co. were added to, the EEIEdison Electric Institute Index that was used in the Company's proxy statement relating to its 19941997 annual meeting of shareholders. 17 22 APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS The firm of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., independent certified public accountants, has served as auditors for the Company continuously since 1952. The board of directors, upon recommendation of the Audit Committee, proposes to continue such firm's services as auditors for the Company for the year ending December 31, 1995.1998. Neither such firm nor any of its associates has any relationship with the Company except in their capacity as auditors. The persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote in accordance with the choice specified thereon, or, if no choice is properly indicated, in favor of the appointment of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. as auditors of the Company. A representative of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. is expected to attend the annual meeting. If present, the representative will have an opportunity to make a statement during the meeting if he or she so desires and will respond to appropriate questions raised during the meeting. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT TO THE 1990 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN AND THE RELATED AMENDMENT TO THE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS The board of directors (the "Board") intends to adopt, subject to approval by the shareholders of the Company, an amendment to the Long-Term Plan and an amendment to the Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan, each effective as of April 24, 1998 (collectively such plans as so amended, the "Amended Plan"). The purpose of the Amended Plan is to strengthen the Company's ability to attract and retain non-employee directors with appropriate experience and ability and to enhance the identification of these directors with the interests of shareholders. The members of the board of directors of the Company who are not employees of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company are eligible to participate in the Amended Plan ("Eligible Directors"). Pursuant to the terms of the Amended Plan, each of the Eligible Directors who currently or upon his or her election to the Board owns less than 1,000 shares of the Common Stock will be immediately granted, subject to shareholder approval of the Amended Plan, that number of shares of restricted Common Stock necessary to increase the individual's ownership of Common Stock to 1,000 shares. The Eligible Director will be required to apply $6,000 of the Eligible Director's $18,000 annual retainer toward acquiring a vested interest in all of the shares of restricted Common Stock granted. The shares of restricted Common Stock will vest based on the Fair Market Value (as defined below) of the shares on the date the shares are granted (the "Grant Date") to the Eligible Director. Thus, the Eligible Director will vest annually the number of shares of Common Stock that results when $6,000 is divided by the Fair Market Value of the stock on the Grant Date. On the Grant Date, an Eligible Director may elect to receive the Common Stock outright or defer receipt of the Common Stock under the terms of the Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan. The restricted stock may not be sold, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of until the termination of the Eligible Director's membership on the Board. If the Eligible Director terminates membership on the Board prior to full vesting of the shares of Common Stock granted, the Eligible Director will forfeit any unvested shares. If an Eligible Director elects to defer receipt of the restricted Common Stock under the terms of the Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan, the Eligible Director may not vote the shares until the Common Stock is transferred by the Company at the end of the deferral period and dividends deemed to be paid on the deferred Common Stock would be reinvested in Common Stock until the end of such period. Upon the expiration of the deferral period, the Eligible Director will have ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock on the date of transfer of the shares to the Eligible Director, and the Company will be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the Eligible Director. If the Eligible Director elects to receive the shares of restricted Common Stock on the Grant Date, the Eligible Director will have ownership rights with respect to the shares of restricted Common Stock, 18 23 including the right to vote the shares and receive dividends thereon, subject to the restrictions described above. Upon vesting of the shares, the Eligible Director will have ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the shares vest, and the Company will be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the Eligible Director. The Eligible Director would be entitled to make an election, however, to be taxed on the fair market value of the shares at the Grant Date, and in that event the Company would be entitled to a deduction at that time. Also, pursuant to the terms of the Amended Plan, each Eligible Director, upon his or her election or reelection to the Board, will be granted, subject to shareholder approval of the Amended Plan, an award of an immediately exercisable option to purchase 2,500 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the date of the option grant. Each option expires ten years after the date of the option grant. Each Eligible Director who is currently serving and whose term of office expires in 1999 or 2000 will receive an option to acquire a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the product of 2,500 multiplied by a fraction, with a numerator equal to the years remaining in the Eligible Director's term of office and a denominator equal to three. The stock option grants to those Eligible Directors with unexpired terms will be made on the first business day following the 1998 annual meeting of shareholders. The options granted to Eligible Directors will be nonqualified options. Upon the Eligible Director's exercise of the options, the Eligible Director is taxed at ordinary income rates equal to the difference between the fair market value of the Common Stock received upon exercise and the exercise price. The Company will be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the Eligible Director. For purposes of this proxy statement, Fair Market Value means the average, rounded to the nearest 1/8th, of the high and low sales prices of a share of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions reporting system, as reported in The Wall Street Journal, on the date as of which such value is being determined or, if no sales occurred on such day, then on the next preceding day on which there were such sales. APPROVAL BY SHAREHOLDERS Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, in person or by written proxy, at the 1998 annual meeting of shareholders (at which a quorum must be present). RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS BELIEVES ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED PLAN STRENGTHENS THE COMPANY'S ABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN QUALIFIED PERSONS AS DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS URGES THE SHAREHOLDERS TO VOTE FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED PLAN. PROXIES RECEIVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS SHAREHOLDERS SPECIFY OTHERWISE ON THEIR PROXY CARD. PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO DELETE SECTION 3 OF ARTICLE 7 THEREOF PROPOSED AMENDMENT The Company's board of directors has adopted, and is recommending to the shareholders for their approval at the 1998 annual meeting of shareholders, a resolution to amend the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation to delete section 3 of article 7 thereof (the "Article 7 Amendment"). Currently section 3 of article 7 of the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation states that "[n]o director shall be required to own any stock in the Corporation." The board of directors' resolution authorizes that 19 24 section 3 of article 7 of the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation be deleted in its entirety. If the shareholders approve the Article 7 Amendment, section 3 of article 7 of the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation will be replaced by: "Article 7. Section 3. This section is intentionally omitted." REASONS FOR AMENDMENT The board of directors authorized the deletion of section 3 of article 7 of the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation so that the proposed Stock Ownership Policy and the Restated Articles of Incorporation would be consistent. Under the Stock Ownership Policy, all outside directors should own at least 1,000 shares of Common Stock. The board of directors did not want to have a provision of the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation appear to be inconsistent with the Stock Ownership Policy and therefore the board is recommending that shareholders approve the amendment to the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation to delete section 3 of article 7 thereof. APPROVAL BY SHAREHOLDERS Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding capital stock of the Company. If approved by the shareholders of the Company, the Article 7 Amendment will be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Louisiana in the form of Articles of Amendment to the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation. If this proposal is not approved by the shareholders, the Articles of Amendment will not be filed. RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS BELIEVES THAT THE PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE COMPANY'S RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO DELETE SECTION 3 OF ARTICLE 7 THEREOF IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE COMPANY AND RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSAL. PROXIES RECEIVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS SHAREHOLDERS SPECIFY OTHERWISE ON THEIR PROXY CARD. PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO CHANGE THE COMPANY'S NAME TO CLECO CORPORATION PROPOSED AMENDMENT The Company's board of directors has adopted, and is recommending to the shareholders for their approval at the 1998 annual meeting of shareholders, a resolution to amend article 1 of the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation to change the Company's name (the "Article 1 Amendment"). The applicable text of the board of directors' resolution is as follows: "RESOLVED, That in connection with the proposal to change the Company's name to Cleco Corporation, the Board of Directors authorizes Article 1. of the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation to be amended to read in its entirety as follows: 'Article 1. The name of the Corporation is hereby declared to be CLECO CORPORATION'." REASONS FOR A NAME CHANGE The markets in which the Company operates are changing and so are its customers. Cleco is currently positioning itself to take advantage of the opportunities that will present themselves as customer choice is introduced into the Company's service territory and surrounding areas and the related transformation of the Company from the traditional electric service provider it has been for over 60 years begins. The perception of such a transformation must also occur in the minds of Cleco's customers, 20 25 shareholders and the public. A name change, new logo and new approach to Cleco's overall identity will help solidify the Company's identity with existing customers and provide a better platform from which to launch new market initiatives. APPROVAL BY SHAREHOLDERS Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding capital stock of the Company. If approved by the shareholders of the Company, the Article 1 Amendment will be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Louisiana in the form of Articles of Amendment to the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation. If this proposal is not approved by the shareholders, the Articles of Amendment will not be filed. If the Article 1 Amendment is adopted, shareholders will not be required to exchange outstanding stock certificates for new certificates. RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS BELIEVES THAT THE PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE COMPANY'S RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO CHANGE THE COMPANY'S NAME TO CLECO CORPORATION IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE COMPANY AND RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSAL. PROXIES RECEIVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS SHAREHOLDERS SPECIFY OTHERWISE ON THEIR PROXY CARD. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS The following table sets forth, to the knowledge of the Company based on a review of the information and as of the dates indicated, certain information with respect to each person who is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock or $100 Preferred Stockany class of the Company.Company's voting securities.
SHARES OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK $100 PREFERRED STOCK BENEFICIALLY OWNED BENEFICIALLY OWNED ------------------------- ------------------------- AMOUNT AND--------------------------------- AMOUNT AND NATURE OF NATURE OF BENEFICIAL PERCENTAGE BENEFICIAL PERCENTAGE NAME AND ADDRESS BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF CLASS OWNERSHIP OF CLASS---------------- -------------------- ---------- The Prudential Insurance Company of America Prudential Plaza Newark, NJ 07102-3777.............. 1,147,372 5.12% State StreetUMB Bank, and Trust Company,N.A., Trustee of the ESOP Trust 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110................... 297,188 79.4% As of December 31, 1994, based on a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Reporting entity states that it has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 12,412 shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 1,134,960 shares. As of December 31, 1994, based upon a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Reporting entity states that it has shared dispositive power with respect to 297,188 shares and shared voting power with respect to 297,188 shares. Such 297,188 shares are held by State Street Bank and Trust Company as the ESOP trustee ("ESOP Trustee") under the ESOP trust ("ESOP Trust") established pursuant to the Company's 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan, ("Savings Plan"). Such 297,188 shares are convertible under certain circumstances pursuant to the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation and the governing instruments of the ESOP Trust and the Savings Plan into 1,426,503 shares of Common Stock, subject to antidilution adjustment, or approximately 6.4% of the Common Stock outstanding as of December 31, 1994. Participants in the Savings Plan have voting rights with respect to $100 Preferred Stock (or Common Stock into which such stock has been converted) allocated to their accounts. The ESOP Trustee is required to vote unallocated shares, and allocated shares as to which it has received no voting instructions from participants, in the same proportion as allocated shares as to which it has received voting instructions from participants. Participants in the Savings Plan have, in the event of a tender or exchange offer, investment discretion with respect to shares of $100 Preferred Stock (or Common Stock into which such stock has been converted) allocated to their accounts. In such an event, the ESOP Trustee is required to tender unallocated shares in the same proportion that it tenders allocated shares as to which it has received investment instructions, but has no power to tender allocated shares as to which it has received no investment instructions. Reporting1010 Grand, Kansas City, MO 64106......................... 290,731(1) %
- --------------- (1) As of December 31, 1997, based upon a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The reporting entity states that it has shared dispositive power with respect to 290,731 shares and shared voting power with respect to 290,731 shares. Such 290,731 shares are held by UMB Bank, N.A., as trustee (the "ESOP Trustee") of the ESOP component (the "ESOP") of the Company's 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan ("Savings Plan"). Such 290,731 shares are convertible under certain circumstances pursuant to the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation and the governing instruments of the ESOP and the Savings Plan into 1,395,509 shares of Common Stock, subject to antidilution adjustment, or approximately 6.2% of the Common Stock outstanding as of December 31, 1997. Participants in the Savings Plan have voting rights with respect to shares of $100 Preferred Stock (or Common Stock into which such stock has been converted) allocated to their accounts. The ESOP Trustee is required to vote unallocated shares in the same proportion as allocated shares as to which it has received voting instructions from participants. Participants in the Savings Plan have, in the event of a tender or exchange offer, investment discretion with respect to shares of $100 Preferred Stock (or Common Stock into which such stock has been converted) allocated to their accounts. In such an event, the ESOP Trustee is required to tender unallocated shares in the same proportion that it tenders allocated shares as to which it has received investment instructions, but has no power to tender allocated shares as to which it has received no investment instructions. The reporting entity also states that it, as trustee of various collective investor funds for employee benefit plans and other index accounts and various 21 26 personal trust accounts, has sole voting power with respect to 73,124 shares of Common Stock, shared voting power with respect to 3,400 shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 72,060 shares of Common Stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 824 shares of Common Stock. 20 ANNUAL REPORT The 1994 annual reportA shareholder survey card, the Company's 1997 Year in Review and the enclosed 1997 Annual Report to shareholders, includingShareholders, which contains the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 1994, is currently1997, accompany the proxy material being mailed to all shareholders. No part ofThe shareholder survey card, the 1994 annual report1997 Year in Review and the Annual Report to shareholders is to be deemed to beShareholders are not a part of the proxy solicitation material. PROPOSALS BY SHAREHOLDERS Proposals of shareholders intended to be presented at the Company's annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 1996,1999, and otherwise eligible, must be received by the Company (at the address indicated on the first page of this proxy statement) no later than November 8, 199511, 1998 (subject to certain provisions of the Company's bylawsBylaws which require that certain proposals be submitted 180 days before such meeting) to be included in the Company's proxy material and form of proxy relating to such meeting. OTHER MATTERS Management does not intend to bring any other matters before the meeting and has not been informed that any other matters are to be presented to the meeting by others. If other matters properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof, the persons named in the accompanying proxy and acting thereunder intend to vote in accordance with their best judgment. ALL SHARES THAT A SHAREHOLDER OWNS, NO MATTER HOW FEW, SHOULD BE REPRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS. THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY SHOULD THEREFORE BE COMPLETED, SIGNED, DATED AND RETURNED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. By order of the board of directors. /s/ GREGORY L. NESBITT Gregory L. Nesbitt President and Chief Executive Officer March 8, 1995 2111, 1998 22 DIRECTION CARD FRONT27 CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING ON APRIL 21, 1995 VOTING DIRECTION TO CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 401(K) SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN TRUSTEES As a participant24, 1998 The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Gregory L. Nesbitt, Thomas J. Howlin and Michael P. Prudhomme, and each of them (the "Proxy Committee"), his or her true and lawful agents and proxies, with full power of substitution in each, to represent the Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan, I hereby direct Merrill Lynch Trust Company, Trustee, to vote those shares of Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. Common Stock and State Street Bank Trust Company, Trustee, to vote those shares of Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. Convertible Preferred Stock allocated to my account as followsundersigned at the annual meeting of shareholders of Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. (the "Company"), to be held at the Pineville High School Auditorium, 1511 Line Street, Pineville, Louisiana, on Friday, April 21, 1995,24, 1998, and at any adjournments thereof, on all matters coming before said meeting. Receipt of the notice of the meeting and the proxy statement, both dated March 8, 1995,11, 1998, is acknowledged. The following items of business will be considered at the aforesaid annual meeting: 1. Election of threefour Class I Directors. Nominees: Sherian G. Cadoria, Hugh J. KellyRichard B. Crowell, David M. Eppler and Gregory L. P Nesbitt, whose terms of office expire in 1998.2001. R 2. Proposal to approve appointment of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. as auditors. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO SPECIFY YOUR CHOICES BY MARKING THE APPROPRIATE BOXES (SEE REVERSE SIDE) BUT YOU NEED NOT MARK ANY BOXES IF YOU WISH TO VOTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RECOMMENDATIONS. THE TRUSTEE CANNOT VOTE YOUR SHARES UNLESS YOU SIGN AND RETURN THIS CARD. DIRECTION CARD BACK ___ Please mark your |O 3. Proposal to amend the Company's 1990 Long-Term Incentive Compensation X | votes as in this |___| example. 1628 This direction card when executed will be voted inPlan for the manner directed herein. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS DIRECTION CARD WILL BE VOTED "FOR" ITEMS 1 AND 2. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ALL PROPOSALS. 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS. (SEE REVERSE) FOR WITHHELD ___ ___ | | | | |___| |___| For, except vote withheldbenefit of the outside directors of the Company and to make related amendments to the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan Y for Directors. 4. Proposal to amend the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation to delete section 3 of article 7 thereof. 5. Proposal to amend the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from the following nominee(s): ____________________________________________ 2. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE APPOINTMENT OF FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P. AS AUDITORS. ___ ___ ___ | | | | | | |___| |___| |___| NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. _________________________________________ _________________________________________ SIGNATURE(S) DATE PROXY CARD FRONT P CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE R ANNUAL MEETING ON APRIL 21, 1995 O The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Gregory L. Nesbitt, David M. Eppler and Michael P. Prudhomme, and each of them (the "Proxy Committee"), his or her true and lawful agents and proxies, with full power of X substitution in each, to represent the undersigned at the annual meeting of shareholders of Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc., to be held at the Pineville High School Auditorium, 1511 Line Street, Pineville, Louisiana, on Y Friday, April 21, 1995, and at any adjournments thereof, on all matters coming before said meeting. Receipt of the notice of the meeting and the proxy statement, both dated March 8, 1995, is acknowledged. The following items of business will be considered at the aforesaid annual meeting: 1. Election of three Class I Directors. Nominees: Sherian G. Cadoria, Hugh J. Kelly and Gregory L. Nesbitt, whose terms of office expire in 1998. 2. Proposal to approve appointment of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. as auditors.Cleco Corporation. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO SPECIFY YOUR CHOICES BY MARKING THE APPROPRIATE BOXES (SEE REVERSE SIDE) BUT YOU NEED NOT MARK ANY BOXES IF YOU WISH TO VOTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RECOMMENDATIONS. THE PROXY COMMITTEE CANNOT VOTE YOUR SHARES UNLESS YOU SIGN AND RETURN THIS CARD. ACTION TAKEN PURSUANT TO THIS PROXY CARD WILL BE EFFECTIVE AS TO ALL THE SHARES (WHETHER COMMON OR PREFERRED, AND, IF PREFERRED, OF ANY CLASS OR SERIES) THAT YOU OWN. PROXY CARD BACK ___28 [ ] Please mark your | X | votes as in this |___| example. 1628 This proxy when executed will be voted in the manner directed herein. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED "FOR" ITEMS 11,2,3,4 AND 2.5. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ALL PROPOSALS. 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS. (SEE REVERSE) FOR WITHHELD ___ ___ | | | | |___| |___| FOR WITHHELD FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 1. ELECTION OF [ ] [ ] 2. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE [ ] [ ] [ ] DIRECTORS. APPOINTMENT OF COOPERS & (SEE REVERSE) LYBRAND L.L.P. AS AUDITORS.
For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s): ____________________________________________ 2. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE APPOINTMENT OF FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P. AS AUDITORS. ___ ___ ___ | | | | | | |___| |___| |___|- ------------------------------------------- FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 3. PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE COMPANY'S 1990 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN FOR THE BENEFIT [ ] [ ] [ ] OF THE OUTSIDE DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY AND TO MAKE RELATED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY'S DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 4. PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE COMPANY'S RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO DELETE SECTION 3 OF [ ] [ ] [ ] ARTICLE 7 THEREOF. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 5. PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE COMPANY'S RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO CHANGE THE NAME OF [ ] [ ] [ ] THE COMPANY FROM CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. TO CLECO CORPORATION.
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. _________________________________________ _________________________________________------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- SIGNATURE(S) DATE